New Verified Business Manager products are now available – Explore the latest BM deals today.
Before you buy verified BM, compare the supplier’s sales explanation with the work its delivery team actually proposes.
A salesperson might describe “complete setup,” while the technical team lists only an assessment and basic configuration. A promised delivery date might also depend on information that has not yet been requested.
These differences need clarification before your business relies on the offer.
This guide explains how to identify conflicting statements, request one consistent proposal, and define a result your team can inspect.
Keep the quotation, package description, technical notes, and messages that influenced your buying decision.
Identify the exact point of disagreement.
For example:
The sales message says a live handover is included. The technical proposal lists written instructions only. Please confirm which delivery method the quoted price covers.
A specific question is easier to resolve than a general complaint that the offer is unclear.
Check dates and versions. An earlier description may have been replaced by a later proposal, but your team should understand what changed and whether it accepted that change.
Ask what each important phrase means for your order.
| Sales wording | Question to clarify |
|---|---|
| Complete setup | Which configuration tasks and checks are included? |
| Full support | Which issues, channels, hours, and service period are covered? |
| Fast delivery | Which milestone is being promised, with what prerequisites? |
| Everything included | Which assets, services, subscriptions, and charges are covered? |
| Ready for your business | Which intended workflow has been assessed? |
| Technical team included | What work will that team perform? |
Use the answers to build a written scope.
Avoid letting a broad package label stand in for the details your business needs to evaluate cost, responsibilities, and completion.
Ask the supplier to explain why the descriptions differ.
The cause may be an outdated package description, an assumption about your existing setup, a newly discovered dependency, or a misunderstanding about the requested outcome.
Separate these possibilities.
If the supplier assumed your website developer would complete part of the work, identify that task and confirm whether your developer can actually perform it.
If the technical team discovered a limitation, ask what evidence supports the finding and how it changes the proposed approach.
Understanding the cause helps both sides decide whether the scope needs clarification, correction, or a new proposal.
Request a joint clarification involving the person responsible for commercial terms and the person responsible for delivery.
Your team should not have to carry conflicting messages between departments.
Use a short agenda:
Confirm the intended business outcome.
Review the conflicting statements.
Identify the work required.
Assign responsibilities.
Confirm pricing and timing.
Record unresolved questions.
Designate one contact to issue the consolidated response.
A useful meeting ends with written decisions. A call that produces another set of verbal assurances leaves the same uncertainty in place.
Review promises about approval, feature availability, or performance carefully.
Ask the supplier to identify what it will prepare, configure, demonstrate, or document. Keep those commitments separate from decisions made by an external platform.
If a claim depends on current platform requirements, request the applicable official source and an explanation of its relevance to your intended use.
Also clarify the underlying business arrangement:
Which business is represented?
Who controls the relevant assets?
What access is proposed?
How is the arrangement authorized?
What depends on continuing supplier involvement?
A technical explanation should answer these questions rather than simply repeat the sales wording.
A scope clarification can affect more than the task list.
If additional implementation is required, ask whether the quoted price includes it. If the supplier needs new information from your team, discuss how that affects scheduling.
Request one updated record covering:
| Area | What the revised proposal should state |
|---|---|
| Deliverables | Included work and explicit exclusions |
| Buyer inputs | Information, access, and internal tasks required |
| Price | Confirmed total and separately quoted additions |
| Schedule | Milestones and dependencies |
| Testing | Agreed checks and expected evidence |
| Handover | Documents, demonstrations, and recipients |
| Support | Coverage, duration, and escalation contact |
Do not assess a revised price without also checking what changed in the scope.
Likewise, do not retain an earlier deadline automatically when the agreed work has expanded.
Once the descriptions are consistent, explain how your team will review delivery.
For a document, identify the sections required. For configuration, specify the settings or workflow to demonstrate. For training, define the audience, topics, and supporting materials.
An acceptance criterion might say:
The designated operator will attend a handover session covering the agreed workflow and receive a written summary of completed configuration, known limitations, and outstanding tasks.
That is easier to assess than “full onboarding completed.”
Record any requirement that remains uncertain. Do not mark it resolved merely because the supplier has acknowledged the question.
Request a dated proposal or amendment containing the agreed clarification.
Keep earlier records, but make the version being accepted easy to identify. Confirm that the delivery team will use it.
If an important contradiction remains unresolved, identify its effect on the buying decision. Your business might request further assessment, narrow the scope, or decide not to proceed.
For an order already underway, review the discrepancy against the accepted agreement and request a written resolution. Keep discussions about existing commitments separate from genuinely new buyer requests.
Consider a hypothetical buyer who receives a sales message stating that integration assistance is included.
The technical proposal covers connection guidance, but the buyer expects the supplier to modify application code and test the complete workflow.
During clarification, the parties identify three separate tasks: guidance, development, and testing. They then agree which tasks the supplier will perform and which remain with the buyer’s engineers.
The revised proposal can now be evaluated on its actual scope. The original phrase alone could not support that decision.
Hello, regarding proposal [reference], we would like to reconcile the sales description with the technical scope. The sales statement says [wording], while the technical proposal describes [wording]. Our intended outcome is [requirement]. Please provide one written response confirming included work, exclusions, buyer responsibilities, dependencies, price, delivery milestones, testing, and support. Please identify any questions that require further assessment before we confirm the order.
Not necessarily. Ask for the reason and a clear correction. Evaluate whether the explanation resolves the issue using specific details.
Request one agreed proposal that both sides can deliver. Your business should not have to choose between conflicting descriptions.
Request the information needed to assess the purchase before committing. Identify which uncertainty prevents your team from making a decision.
They may lead to a revised proposal. Review the explanation, scope, cost, and timing before accepting the change.
Document the difference against the accepted scope and request a completion or clarification plan. Keep evidence of what was agreed and delivered.
Prepare your intended use and the questions that remain unclear across the supplier’s sales and technical descriptions.
If you need assistance reviewing your situation, visit BMXMDN to discuss your business verification and setup requirements.
Request a proposal through BMXMDN covering a consistent scope, clearly assigned responsibilities, confirmed pricing, delivery evidence, and ongoing support.
